Thursday 4 August 2011

Getting a Fair Price for your Writing: Constant Content

If you're serious about making money from freelance writing, Constant Content is the way to go.

It's basically a marketplace for articles. You produce a piece of writing and upload it to the site and people looking to buy content browse articles on the site and purchase the articles that meet their needs. If there's nothing already there that's suitable, the customer can issue a custom request, specifying the topic and length of the article and the amount they are willing to pay.

On Constant Content, you set your own prices. If you think an article is worth $70, list it for $70. Yes, there are buyers willing to pay that much for a few hundred words of quality writing. I sold an unsolicited article for $70 during my first two weeks on the site.

Constant Content take 35% of every sale you make. Yes, that's a lot. But the amount you are left with, if you're pricing your articles correctly, is still more than you would get working for a content mill. If you sign up through my referral link (for which I'd be really grateful and happy to help you get to grips with the site if you need a hand - just get in contact) then I get 5% of the value of your sales, but that comes out of CC's 35%. You still get your full 65% share.

There are three ways to sell your work on Constant Content.  You can offer usage rights, unique rights, or full rights.

  • Usage Rights: the customer buys the right to use your article, in its original form, and with you credited as the author. You retain ownership of the article and can sell further usage licenses or use it yourself.
  • Unique Rights: the customer buys the right to be the only publisher of the article. The article must be published in its original form and you must be credited as the author.
  • Full Rights: the customer buys the right to take ownership of the article. They can alter it, publish it under their own name and even resell it.

You can also offer all three, priced at different levels, and leave it up to the buyer which one they go for.

Pros of writing for Constant Content:
  • Set your own prices.
  • Buyers will actually pay a fair price for content - a quick glance at content that has recently sold on the site shows the majority of articles selling at $40-$50.
  • You can write about whatever you like - or write in response to requests if you're stuck for ideas.
  • If you sell for usage rights, there's the chance of passive income as more licenses get purchased, and you'll get your name in print (or more likely on screen).
  • If a customer likes your work, they can make private requests to you for more articles.

Cons of writing for Constant Content:
  • You need patience: the review process that takes place whenever you upload a new article can take up to a week.
  • You need even more patience: even though many articles do sell quickly, you might be waiting a long time for some of them to sell.
  • No guarantee that an article will sell. If your content isn't selling at all, try lowering your prices, writing in response to requests, or changing the topics you target.
  • You need to produce high quality work. If you didn't proofread it, it's not going to get accepted.

Yesterday I received my first paycheck from CC, for $107.45. I've written 8 articles and made 5 sales (3 full rights + two usage). I've identified a topic in which my articles get snapped up quickly, so am hopeful that I can make some good money here - if I can put aside all my other writing projects long enough to produce some articles! The lack of deadlines at CC means that I do tend to neglect my activities here, which is silly because it earns me more than any other site.

Click here to sign up at Constant-Content

First Bright Hub payment!

I just received my first payment from Bright Hub, for a grand total of $15.02.  Okay, so it's not a fortune, but I've only been a Bright Hub member for two weeks.

The $15 is for the one article that I've published so far, How Calculus is Used in Astronomy.
The $0.02 is revenue sharing for the one day that the article existed for during July (I published it on July 30th).

Verdict?  Bright Hub seems like a great place for writing about science, health, business or technology subjects.

What I like about Bright Hub:
  • Upfront payments of $15 per article, plus ongoing revenue sharing.
  • Bright Hub suggest titles of articles based on what people are searching for in google: basically, they do the hardest part of making money through content - keyword research - and leave you to get on with writing.
  • Supportive and relatively speedy editing process. My article was published two days after submission, with only minor changes required (moving an image and fixing a hyperlink).
  • Bright Hub encourages you to write under your own name, which means it's a good place to build up a portfolio of work.
What I don't like about Bright Hub:
  • Their behind-the-scenes site is complicated, confusing and difficult to navigate. I'm sure I'll get used to it in time, but I can't help feeling it would be improved by being simplified.
  • The options for laying out your article aren't great either. You can't resize images or add captions, or create floating text boxes for key information.
  • Because Bright Hub has quality standards, I feel as though I have to make each article perfect. For the time I spend creating an article, $15 is a poor rate of pay. The compensations for this are:
    1. I'll probably get quicker with practice.
    2. Article continues to pay out once its published, without me doing anything more.
    3. The fact that I had to answer to an editor is actually a good thing when it comes to using Bright Hub articles to apply for further work. Anyone can self-publish an article, but to have an editor approve your work as worthy of payment shows some writing ability.
I will definitely continue to write for Bright Hub.

Have you written for Bright Hub? Share your experience in a comment :)